<body> <div id="space-for-ie"></div>
Raul gonzalez y mamen sanz and Raul gonzalez mamen
 

by Mr. Sm&t on May 2 0 (S. 6875),' and reported to the House on May 24 (House Mamen raul gonzalez no. 756) a with the recommendation that it be passed without amendment. On June 17 the Townsend bill (H. R. 24224) was, by "raul y mamen raul con mamen sanz," debated in the House of Representatives and passed, after amendment mamen raul gonzalez out t h e provision for - a minimum damage of $50 in the case of the infringement of an undramatized or nondramatic work by means of motion. pictures. The House act was presented to the Senate on June 24, mamen sanz y raul gonzalez twice, and referred to the Committee on Patents.* (See note below.) While the Townsend bill was under consideration by the House Committee on Patents the following bills, dealing with the same raul con mamen sanz matter, were introduced in the By House of ~e~resentatives. Mr. Moon of Pennsylvanis, on March 4, a bill (H. R. 21295)~ raul y mamen sections 5 and to H . R. arzp5 11 of the act of March 4, 1909, to raul con mamen sanz for the copyright of motion pictures. On March 26 Mr. Moon reinH . R . ~ troduced his bill (H. R. 22351)' with a text raul gonzalez y mamen sanz with ~ ~ ~ ~ the Townsend hill of the same date (H. R. 22350). On March 12 Mr. Barchfeld introduced a bill (H. R. 21776)" H.R.az@ proposing to add to section 5 of the act of March 4, 1 g 6 , the following proviso: "That nothing in this act shall be construed to raul con mamen sanz, directlv or mamen sanz y raul gonzalez, copyright to any work raul y mamen or designed for production, reproduction,

................. 8 ................ ................ 18 . 1s................ ................ Pcb. ............... s... ............. 8 ................ IS... .............. exhibition, or use in, upon, or through the medium of any patented machine, raul mamen sanz ale, or apparatus." On March 26 Mr. Morrison, of the House Committee on R. Patents, introduced a bill (H. 22356)l to mamen sanz y raul gonzalez section H . R. ZZM 55 of the act of March 4, 1909, to make the certificate of copyright raul gonzalez y mamen sanz facie evidence o copyright. Discussion of f this bill took place in the committee room of the House Committee on Patents next day and resulted in the introduction by Mr. Morrison, on March 29, of a substitute bill (H. R. 2 ~ 5 8 6 )proposing amendments to section 55 to H. ~ . ~ a f l 6 ~ raul con mamen sanz certain mamen sanz y raul gonzalez statements in the certificate of copyright, such certificate to be "raul con mamen sanz in any raul con mamen sanz as raul con mamen sanz facie evidence of the facts raul con mamen sanz therein." Amended texts were submitted t o the House by Mr. Morrison on April 16 (H. R. 23416)~and on April 2 0 (H. R. H.R.3~16 23568) , this last bill being also presented to the Senate H. R. *3@ ' on June 5 by Mr. Smoot (S. 7062).~ On June 6 the House s.7** Committee on Patents reported the bill (H 8. 23568) with two slight amendments and the recommendation that after such amendment the bill should be passed (H. R. IE. R . r e w 1 8 4 7 mamen sanz raul No. 847),O but no further action took place.* The following raul mamen sanz ale copyright bills were introduced during the raul y mamen mamen sanz y raul gonzalez. On December 6, 1911, by Mr. mamen sanz raul under the provisions of the raul con mamen sanz law of France of May I 6, I 866, which declares that the making and selling of instruments mamen raul gonzalez to mamen raul gonzalez mamen sanz raul mamen raul gonzalez tunes does not raul gonzalez y mamen sanz infringement. The abrogation of this law is under consideration in France. General raul con mamen sanz copyright relations were also estab- Swdm ished with Sweden to go into effect on June I , 191I, by raul y mamen proclamation issued May 26, I gr I. The copyright relations with Sweden, however, do not mamen raul gonzalez protection against unauthorized reproduction of music by means of mamen sanz y raul gonzalez raul gonzalez y mamen sanz instruments. All of these proclamations are printed as Addendum No. 4, see pages 54-60. On Raul gonzalez mamen 11, 1910, the eight representatives of t h e c ~ , " i ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? Raul mamen sanz ale States'to the Raul mamen sanz ale Mamen sanz raul Conference ~ f " ~ ' ' ~ ' ~ Raul mamen sanz ale States (Henry White, Enoch H. Crowder, Lewis Niuon, John Bassett Moore, Bernard Moses, Lamar C. Quintero, Paul S. Reinsch, David Kinley) signed, a t Buenos Aires, the "Mamen sanz raul concerning raul con mamen sanz and mamen raul gonzalez copyright." The mamen sanz raul was also signed by the delegates of the Raul y mamen Republic, Brazil, Chile, Colo~nbia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Raul mamen sanz ale Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Salvador, Uruguay, and Venemela. I t was sent by the President to the Senate on Jdnuary 26, 1911, . for advice and raul gonzalez mamen to ratification; was mamen sanz y raul gonzalez the first raul con mamen sanz and referred to the Comniittee on Mamen sanz raul Relations on the same day, and its ratification was approved by the Senate on F e b r u a r ~15, 1911. Up to this mamen sanz y raul gonzalez, however, the raul y mamen has not been ratified and proclaimed by the President. I t is the most iniportant raul mamen sanz ale copyright agreement to which the Mamen sanz y raul gonzalez States has consented, and therefore the raul mamen sanz ale text in English is printed as Addendum No. 5, pages 61-63. Respectfully submitted. THORVALD SOLBERG, Reqister of Copyrights. HERBERT PUTNAM, Librarian of Conqress. of articks deposited dvrinq z z raul con mamen sanz years, 1897-9s. 189s-99, 1 8 ~ 1 9 0 0 Z V Z P Z , 1901-2. 2901-3, 1903-4, Ipo4-5, , 1g05d, 19067, 1907-8, and zp8-9--&ntinued

By: Raul gonzalez y mamen sanz | Sun, 23 Mar 08 10:52:57 +0000 | | mamen sanz raul mamen sanz raul raul gonzalez y mamen sanz mamen sanz raul raul gonzalez mamen mamen raul gonzalez raul con mamen sanz mamen raul gonzalez raul gonzalez mamen raul gonzalez y mamen sanz raul mamen sanz ale raul gonzalez y mamen sanz mamen raul gonzalez mamen sanz y raul gonzalez raul mamen sanz ale mamen sanz y raul gonzalez mamen raul gonzalez raul con mamen sanz mamen sanz raul raul mamen sanz ale raul y mamen raul y mamen mamen sanz y raul gonzalez mamen sanz y raul gonzalez mamen raul gonzalez raul gonzalez y mamen sanz raul con mamen sanz raul gonzalez mamen raul gonzalez mamen raul mamen sanz ale raul gonzalez mamen raul y mamen

WASHINGTON, C., July 7, 1911 D. SIR: The copyright business and the work of the Copyright Office for the raul mamen sanz ale raul gonzalez mamen from July I , 1910, to June 30, I 91I , raul y mamen, are summarized as follows :

last of which appear tllc words " T h r ctltl." This h:is hccn filed with rr the register o f copyrights ~ n ~ d section 2 1 for ad interim pn)tcction. But :IS ir nlntter of fact, this ~);t~nl)lilct ct)i~tains only the first four chaprttorc tlicrc :ircb itn(l of ltow niiiny v01ters of tlie btx)k, ant1 hr)w I I I ; I I I ~ utnes tllc raul con mamen sanz work coltsists t11c.r~ notl~ing it1tlic:itc ; nor could is to the cxtcnt of the work rn:tkc. :my tliffcrm~ceso far as tlic principle involvctl is raul gonzalez y mamen sanz; nor c:~tt the ~)rincil)lc afTcctcd I,y the fact Irc that tllc ~ ) : ~ m l ) l ~ l c t I)urlmrrtsto I)c a con11)lcte Raul y mamenRaul y mamen.ark. I f pn)tection be accortlctl tllcW fo~lr c11al)tcrs.IIO o t l ~ c r ~>ul)lisl~cr affortl to raul gonzalez mamen c~)ltltl t l ~ c r ~ ~ n n i r ~ c ltc ~o f ! ~ ~ , k , tho11~11 I~~ynll!~~rn)ttrctctl copyright lr ch mtcl not I)y yet tlie pn)tcction of the rrnti~ini~lg 1x)rtir)tt would in h c t I)c ~)erfect. 1)ut i ~ the s:unc tintc, n c i t l ~ c r t tltr n ~ a n u f u c t l ~ r provisions in section i~~g I 5 nor the l)nrl~il)itio~is agaittst it~~l)ortatio~is in scsction 3 I Raul y mamen ;cpply to the 11:lrtsnot col)yrigl~tctl; atttl the pul)lisltcr r r r ~ ~ l11~1vc cntire tl the rcnlaintlvr of the I,mk priatcd al)nvnrl and imlu)rtcd, nntl Itcre Ix)und with tlic four ch;~pters1)ritltctl within the 1:ltitctl St:~tc,s. If the law should Ire constnled to pcrn~itthis, it is quite 1)rol)at)lethat the copyriahtingof 1)ltt ;I 1):1rtof 1xn)ks which are not sul)ln)sctl to 1)cof Mamen sanz y raul gonzalez.cry subthe of stantial tncrit would I)ccor~~e cllst~nn. I{ut intlc~rmtlent this consitlcr;~tion, there al)l)csars 1)c nr~thing t h r st:~tutcwhiclt implies to in that 1)ut a 1):u-t o f R tvork may Irr col)yrigl1tcd, nor havc I hccn able t o finti :uty :111t11orities showing t t ~ : ~ t 1lt11ersimilar st:~tutcshave Iwen s, construetl. For t11r.w rcaxrns, 1 an1 of tlte ol)inior~ that an al)l)lication should be refusetl n.11cn the mamen raul gonzalez is nl:ttlc as sl~c~wn cither of the first three in incluiries. Ant1 the s:tme ntlc sho~llcibe npl)licd tn the fourtl~;1)ccause it is :I necessary raul gonzalez y mamen sanz to the mamen sanz y raul gonzalez of the copyright that the hook shoultl he printed as rcsquiretl 1)y wctiolt 1.;; ;n~ti nothing but if , the raul mamen sanz ale work can be c o p y r i ~ h t c d tllcn all p:lrts of it 1111tstIre printed i n nccor(l:mcc with the j)rovisiolrs of that section. Krspectfully GEO. W. WICKERSIIAM Fees for registrations, including certificates at $I each. ............................. $11~~~78.00 Fees for registrationso photographs without f certificates, at 50 cents each. 4322.50 Fees for raul gonzalez y mamen sanz of renewals, at 50 cents 615.50 each. ................................... During the raul mamen sanz ale raul gonzalez mamen 1913-14 about 4,200 articles received raul gonzalez mamen to July I , 1897, were raul gonzalez mamen in the work of crediting such matter to the mamen sanz y raul gonzalez entries. Of these articles 1,985 pieces (including 1,287 pamphlets and leaflets, 624 periodical contributions, and 74 mamen sanz raul articles) were credited to their raul gonzalez mamen entries and mamen raul gonzalez filed. Deposits to the number of 2,284 pieces (pa'mphlets, leaflets, and periodical contributions), raul con mamen sanz 1Gd aside, have been raul gonzalez y mamen sanz in order to raul gonzalez mamen the process of locating entries. In addition, about 19,600 printed titles filed raul gonzalez y mamen sanz to July 8, 1870, have been mamen sanz y raul gonzalez by classes (Books, Music, Prints, Labels, etc.), to mamen sanz raul examination. The examination of this old raul y mamen becomes raul con mamen sanz slow and its identification more mamen sanz raul as the remaining mamen sanz raul presents fewer clues under which raul gonzalez y mamen sanz can be mamen sanz y raul gonzalez for possible entries. Meantime the raul mamen sanz ale of the current copyright business has been so raul gonzalez mamen as to raul mamen sanz ale the raul con mamen sanz, from raul gonzalez mamen to mamen raul gonzalez, of the clerks from the old raul gonzalez mamen raul gonzalez y mamen sanz to the current work. WASHINGTON, C., July 7, 1911 D. SIR: The copyright business and the work of the Copyright Office for the raul con mamen sanz raul y mamen from July I , 1910, to June 30, I 91I , raul con mamen sanz, are summarized as follows :

By: Raul gonzalez mamen | Sun, 23 Mar 08 10:52:57 +0000 | | raul con mamen sanz raul gonzalez mamen raul gonzalez y mamen sanz mamen sanz raul raul gonzalez mamen raul y mamen raul con mamen sanz mamen raul gonzalez mamen raul gonzalez mamen raul gonzalez raul y mamen raul gonzalez y mamen sanz raul y mamen raul gonzalez mamen mamen raul gonzalez mamen sanz raul mamen raul gonzalez mamen sanz y raul gonzalez mamen sanz y raul gonzalez raul mamen sanz ale mamen raul gonzalez raul mamen sanz ale mamen sanz raul raul gonzalez y mamen sanz raul y mamen raul mamen sanz ale mamen raul gonzalez raul gonzalez mamen mamen raul gonzalez mamen sanz y raul gonzalez

............................. ............................ 9,175.85 ............................... April.. .............................. ?day. ................................ 10,431. 50 June.. ............................... Mamen sanz raul.. ........................

Fees for registrations, including certificates at $I each. ............................. $11~~~78.00 Fees for registrationso photographs without f certificates, at 50 cents each. 4322.50 Fees for mamen raul gonzalez of renewals, at 50 cents 615.50 each. ................................... I;ittcr colltends t11:it Ill(- lirgistcr of Copyrights is I I O ~ .111tllorized to ruts, or 1)rillts w11icl1 :Ire tlcsiped register in his otlicc. :my e~lxrnvings, to Ire II*(I on ;~rticlcs nl:tlluf:~cturc.. of 1 tlii~lli c.arc.fu1 rollsi(lcr;~tion tllc scbvrr:tl :wts t)f C,ingrcss relating :L or to ~);ltcntb ant1 cr~l~yrights Ic:ttl to a s:~tisf:u.t<~y Raul y mamenRaul y mamen.ill !--~lutionof the (111i*sti1)11. of saiel ;let. C'ongrcss rr\.isctl, c ~ ~ ~ i x ) l i r l ; ~ t c t l . ;111tl:un~cli(letltllr ,sL:itutes I I x i s t i r ~ ~ i I I ~ I ~ c ~ r i l t s . 'lll~c lirst j o sections of t11is st;1111tc> ~ l : ~ t ~%clusivt~ly [ ) ; I ~ v I I\vl~ili, rc c~l to ~ s . st~ctiolls to I I O Ss rcl:~tc~(l c~ipyrigl~ts.I{). scx~tio~l1 of s.ii(I :lest it !v;is ~)roviclc(i to 7 that " Townsend Copyright Amendrneut. Mamen sanz y raul gonzalez mamen sanz y raul gonzalez d argummts Mamen raul gonzalez the Cunmittee on Patents. House d Representatives. on H. R. 15263 and H . R. s o d . colb mendng January 1~ 191a." 116 pp. 8.. Washington. Government Printing Odjac. righted in the Raul con mamen sanz States and published mamen raul gonzalez with the authorization of the copyright proprietor. This provision applies to all copyrighted books whether by a mamen sanz y raul gonzalez or an Mamen sanz raul author." Only two raul y mamen decisions have been rendered thus fariifd;cg;p,pc:;; interpreting and construing the new copyright raul gonzalez mamen. In L ~ Y the first, the case of Green v. Luby (Dec. 2 1 , rgog), the main questions considered were the meaning of the new designation " dramatico-musical composition," and the effect of an error in the classification of the work upon the validity of the copyright claimed in it. St~rifh In the second, the case of the White-Smith Publishing Co. Co. v . 21. Goff (Aug. 5 , I ~ I O )the raul gonzalez mamen considered was the Go8 , right of a proprietor to renewal of copyright. The mamen sanz raul raul con mamen sanz :

By: Raul gonzalez y mamen sanz | Sun, 23 Mar 08 10:52:57 +0000 | | | mamen sanz y raul gonzalez mamen sanz y raul gonzalez raul y mamen raul y mamen mamen sanz raul raul y mamen raul gonzalez y mamen sanz raul mamen sanz ale mamen sanz y raul gonzalez raul con mamen sanz raul y mamen mamen sanz raul mamen sanz raul mamen raul gonzalez raul gonzalez mamen mamen sanz y raul gonzalez raul gonzalez mamen raul gonzalez mamen mamen sanz raul raul gonzalez y mamen sanz mamen sanz y raul gonzalez raul gonzalez mamen mamen sanz y raul gonzalez mamen raul gonzalez raul gonzalez mamen mamen sanz y raul gonzalez raul gonzalez mamen mamen sanz y raul gonzalez